Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restore FIL convention of inlining code #4366

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2021

Conversation

levsnv
Copy link
Contributor

@levsnv levsnv commented Nov 16, 2021

A previous PR has accidentally uninlined two methods. We are not aware of a significant perf impact in one or another direction, but the intention was to explore the instruction-level impact more before mainlining the change.

@levsnv levsnv requested a review from a team as a code owner November 16, 2021 00:01
@levsnv levsnv added the non-breaking Non-breaking change label Nov 16, 2021
@levsnv levsnv added Perf Related to runtime performance of the underlying code Tech Debt Issues related to debt bug Something isn't working labels Nov 16, 2021
@wphicks
Copy link
Contributor

wphicks commented Nov 16, 2021

@gpucibot merge

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-21.12@3786679). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-21.12    #4366   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   86.01%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      231           
  Lines                   ?    18771           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?    16146           
  Misses                  ?     2625           
  Partials                ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
dask 47.03% <0.00%> (?)
non-dask 78.70% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3786679...663bc97. Read the comment docs.

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit bb588e9 into rapidsai:branch-21.12 Nov 16, 2021
vimarsh6739 pushed a commit to vimarsh6739/cuml that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
A previous PR has accidentally uninlined two methods. We are not aware of a significant perf impact in one or another direction, but the intention was to explore the instruction-level impact more before mainlining the change.

Authors:
  - Levs Dolgovs (https://github.com/levsnv)

Approvers:
  - William Hicks (https://github.com/wphicks)
  - Andy Adinets (https://github.com/canonizer)

URL: rapidsai#4366
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working CUDA/C++ non-breaking Non-breaking change Perf Related to runtime performance of the underlying code Tech Debt Issues related to debt
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants