Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove RAFT memory management (2/2) #4526

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 24, 2022

Conversation

viclafargue
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@viclafargue viclafargue requested a review from a team as a code owner January 26, 2022 17:38
@dantegd dantegd added this to PR-WIP in v22.04 Release via automation Jan 26, 2022
Copy link
Member

@cjnolet cjnolet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM pending CI


// Create stream and allocator
// Create stream
RAFT_CUDA_TRY(cudaStreamCreate(&stream));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not something that needs to be updated in this PR, but we should be creating just about all streams in the handle.

v22.04 Release automation moved this from PR-WIP to PR-Reviewer approved Jan 31, 2022
@viclafargue viclafargue added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Feb 14, 2022
@dantegd
Copy link
Member

dantegd commented Feb 24, 2022

@gpucibot merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit d2099b8 into rapidsai:branch-22.04 Feb 24, 2022
v22.04 Release automation moved this from PR-Reviewer approved to Done Feb 24, 2022
vimarsh6739 pushed a commit to vimarsh6739/cuml that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CUDA/C++ improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants