Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rapids fails to install using mamba #19

Closed
MordicusEtCubitus opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Rapids fails to install using mamba #19

MordicusEtCubitus opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@MordicusEtCubitus
Copy link

MordicusEtCubitus commented May 19, 2022

Dears,

I've tried to install rapids using mamba in place of conda and got this error:

bash$ mamba create -n rapids-mamba -c rapidsai -c nvidia -c conda-forge rapids=22.04 python=3.9 cudatoolkit=11.2 dask-sql
Encountered problems while solving.
Problem: package rapids-22.04.00-cuda11_py39_ge08d166_149 requires ptxcompiler, but none of the providers can be installed

If I try to install ptxcompiler only using mamba I got this issue:

bash$ mamba install -c rapidsai -c nvidia -c conda-forge ptxcompiler
Problem: package ptxcompiler-0.2.0-py39h114ffae_0 has constraint __cuda >=11.0,<=11.5 conflicting with __cuda-11.7-0

I have installed cuda-11-2 only, so I'm surprised but my nvidia-smi show conda 11.7 in the header...

There is no issue if I use conda, so it may be a mamba issue.

But regarding defect 13 #13 maybe it is a version mismatch...

So I prefer to get your point before cross posting

Thanks in advance

@shwina
Copy link

shwina commented May 21, 2022

Thanks for reporting @MordicusEtCubitus . We're aware and working on resolving this issue with the ptxcompiler package. We'll post an update here when a version of ptxcompiler that works with 11.7 drivers is available.

cc: @bdice

@bdice
Copy link
Contributor

bdice commented May 31, 2022

@MordicusEtCubitus This should now be resolved with the new ptxcompiler package for CUDA 11.7. In conda-forge/ptxcompiler-feedstock#10, the upper bound on __cuda was removed (we think it's no longer needed).

Please let us know if you have any further issues!

@gmarkall
Copy link
Contributor

Closing as this appears to be resolved and no further feedback was received.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants