Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump Python requirements in
setup.cfg
andrmm_dev.yml
#982Bump Python requirements in
setup.cfg
andrmm_dev.yml
#982Changes from all commits
fe57b4a
68f32c9
eb6560b
741232b
f07e176
111339a
3f7d08b
3154ebb
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need the upper bound here? Just wondering since we are dropping elsewhere
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes -- these are the
.yml
files used to create dev environments. Since we don't typically want development with 3.10, we keep the upper bound here. This doesn't stop developers from manually building RMM with Python 3.10 if they desire.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible to do something like the following?
If so, we can (in theory) drop the upper bound here and make it the developer's responsibility to specify which Python they want to use.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That’s a good idea —
I have seen other packages specify a yml with a user-provided python spec(edit: apparently this is not a thing, I was wrong).Then update the README/docs to include that specification in the commands to create a conda environment.On that note, it might even make sense to remove the upper bound (use >=11.5) for cudatoolkit and recommend that users pick their version as needed, instead of maintaining two environment files for 11.5 and 11.6.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But is that a valid
conda
command, and does it do the expected thing here (override the python spec in the.yml
?)This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Darn. @shwina I could have sworn I had seen this before but the specifiers after
-f stuff.yml
are ignored, so you can't do what I was suggesting. Sorry about that. 😢