Fix the priority order of slot mappings in which slots are filled #11390
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
indam23
suggested changes
Jul 27, 2022
indam23
approved these changes
Jul 27, 2022
|
🚀 A preview of the docs have been deployed at the following URL: https://11390--rasahq-docs-rasa-v2.netlify.app/docs/rasa |
ancalita
deleted the
ATO-219-priority-of-slot-mapping-opposite-from-rasa-2
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes:
3.x) where the expected priority order in which slot mappings are applicable is from the beginning to the end of the slot mappings list specified in the domain (more context here)Status (please check what you already did):
black(please check Readme for instructions)