You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The formula is correct : support(A→C)=support(A∪C),range: [0,1]. But in the following paragraph, it is written The 'support' metric then computes the support of the combined itemset A ∪ C -- note that 'support' depends on 'antecedent support' and 'consequent support' via min('antecedent support', 'consequent support'). Which is clearly different from the formula.
In mlxtend.frequent_patterns.association_rules support is computed using the formula, and not the minimum between the antecedent support and consequent support.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
There seems to be an incoherence in the support metric description for association rules in this page http://rasbt.github.io/mlxtend/user_guide/frequent_patterns/association_rules/#example-3-frequent-itemsets-with-incomplete-antecedent-and-consequent-information.
The formula is correct :
support(A→C)=support(A∪C),range: [0,1].
But in the following paragraph, it is writtenThe 'support' metric then computes the support of the combined itemset A ∪ C -- note that 'support' depends on 'antecedent support' and 'consequent support' via min('antecedent support', 'consequent support').
Which is clearly different from the formula.In
mlxtend.frequent_patterns.association_rules
support is computed using the formula, and not the minimum between the antecedent support and consequent support.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: