Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new create_counterfactuals func #740

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 13, 2020
Merged

Add new create_counterfactuals func #740

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 13, 2020

Conversation

rasbt
Copy link
Owner

@rasbt rasbt commented Oct 13, 2020

Code of Conduct

Adds a new create_counterfactual function for ML interpretability.

Pull Request Checklist

  • Added a note about the modification or contribution to the ./docs/sources/CHANGELOG.md file (if applicable)
  • Added appropriate unit test functions in the ./mlxtend/*/tests directories (if applicable)
  • Modify documentation in the corresponding Jupyter Notebook under mlxtend/docs/sources/ (if applicable)
  • Ran PYTHONPATH='.' pytest ./mlxtend -sv and make sure that all unit tests pass (for small modifications, it might be sufficient to only run the specific test file, e.g., PYTHONPATH='.' pytest ./mlxtend/classifier/tests/test_stacking_cv_classifier.py -sv)
  • Checked for style issues by running flake8 ./mlxtend

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.07%) to 90.807% when pulling 2311930 on counterfact into 3e501e6 on master.

@rasbt rasbt merged commit 9ab8db7 into master Oct 13, 2020
@rasbt rasbt deleted the counterfact branch November 12, 2020 17:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants