Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

appv take 1 #83

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Aug 3, 2016
Merged

appv take 1 #83

merged 11 commits into from
Aug 3, 2016

Conversation

rasbt
Copy link
Owner

@rasbt rasbt commented Aug 3, 2016

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Aug 3, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Current coverage is 86.47% (diff: 100%)

Merging #83 into master will not change coverage

@@             master        #83   diff @@
==========================================
  Files            93         93          
  Lines          3054       3054          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches        342        342          
==========================================
  Hits           2641       2641          
  Misses          320        320          
  Partials         93         93

Powered by Codecov. Last update 44195c6...47dfc03

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 3, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 89.522% when pulling a16f9eb on appveyor2 into 44195c6 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 3, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 89.522% when pulling 5d6e199 on appveyor2 into 44195c6 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 3, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 89.522% when pulling 3a9fa91 on appveyor2 into 44195c6 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 3, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 89.522% when pulling 7ff4a44 on appveyor2 into 44195c6 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 3, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 89.522% when pulling a2dffe1 on appveyor2 into 44195c6 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 3, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 89.522% when pulling a2dffe1 on appveyor2 into 44195c6 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 3, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 89.522% when pulling a2dffe1 on appveyor2 into 44195c6 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 89.522% when pulling a2dffe1 on appveyor2 into 44195c6 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 3, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 89.522% when pulling 56da976 on appveyor2 into 44195c6 on master.

@rasbt rasbt merged commit 102c6ff into master Aug 3, 2016
This was referenced Aug 3, 2016
Closed
Closed
rasbt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2016
Select features from a k-range in SFS (#82)
ea4f5ca 
* select k-range in SFS

* appv take 1 (#83)

* appv take 1

* appveyeor, compared to travis, sucks really bad

* appveyor sucks

* appveyor is maybe not that bad

* lib dependencies and badge

* lib dependencies and badge

* try circumvent the appveyor memory limitation

* try circumvent the appveyor memory limitation

* win compat unit tests

* win compat unit tests

* update changelog

* update sfs example 8

* resolve merge conflict

* add data unittests

* update sfs example 8

* add data unittests
@rasbt rasbt deleted the appveyor2 branch September 15, 2016 13:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@rasbt @codecov-io @coveralls