Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switched over to TOR, taking forever to now sync #1925

Closed
Aki113s opened this issue Jan 9, 2021 · 9 comments
Closed

Switched over to TOR, taking forever to now sync #1925

Aki113s opened this issue Jan 9, 2021 · 9 comments

Comments

@Aki113s
Copy link

Aki113s commented Jan 9, 2021

So I was not running on TOR for a long time, everything was fully synced and running for a long while, about a year, updated to 1.6.2 and for the first time switched over to TOR. Things synced faster so is TOR that much slower??? I know VPNs and secure networks mean a HUGE hit in speed.

Bitcoin 99.96%
LND at 99.97%

Been that way for 24 hours.

When I first launched it to switch to TOR I was fully synced it said, then rebooted, was in main menu and on the next Sync it is now stuck. Is TOR that slow?? Is this normal for a Node thats just being swapped over to TOR?

@T3chH
Copy link

T3chH commented Jan 10, 2021

I have the same problem on 1.6.2

@chrcoe
Copy link

chrcoe commented Jan 10, 2021

I'm curious if your bitcoind is not connecting properly? I am new to raspiblitz and thought I'd try tor out.

I'm seeing connection failures when i check the bitcoind logs:

$ sudo tail -f /mnt/hdd/bitcoin/debug.log
...snip...
2021-01-10T02:50:10Z ERROR: Error while reading proxy response
2021-01-10T02:50:10Z connect() to 127.0.0.1:9050 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
...snip...

But I know my proxy is running and listening on that port as expected...

@chrcoe
Copy link

chrcoe commented Jan 10, 2021

Just saw this in the install log:

Err:3 https://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org buster InRelease
  The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 74A941BA219EC810 deb.torproject.org archive signing key
Fetched 3,524 B in 2s (2,252 B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: https://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org buster InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 74A941BA219EC810 deb.torproject.org archive signing key
W: Failed to fetch https://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org/dists/buster/InRelease  The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 74A941BA219EC810 deb.torproject.org archive signing key
W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

🤷

@nyxnor
Copy link
Contributor

nyxnor commented Jan 10, 2021

About the connection refused, type the command status to see if there a connected nodes (bitcoin-cli getconnectioncount also work). About the invalid Tor signature, the raspiblitz developers are already discussing this in other topic #1906 (comment)

@chrcoe
Copy link

chrcoe commented Jan 10, 2021

About the connection refused, type the command status to see if there a connected nodes (bitcoin-cli getconnectioncount also work). About the invalid Tor signature, the raspiblitz developers are already discussing this in other topic #1906 (comment)

i am seeing that no nodes are connected to bitcoind:

$ bitcoin-cli getconnectioncount
0

I know that the tor proxy is working as I was able to curl through the proxy to verify IP is seen as a tor exit node and not my real IP.

@nyxnor
Copy link
Contributor

nyxnor commented Jan 10, 2021

You are seeing zero, despite you downloading almost everything, now there are no peers connected to you. Do the following: #1859 (comment).
bitcoin-cli addnode "inputonionaddress.onion:8333 "onetry"

@chrcoe
Copy link

chrcoe commented Jan 10, 2021

You are seeing zero, despite you downloading almost everything, now there are no peers connected to you. Do the following: #1859 (comment).
bitcoin-cli addnode "inputonionaddress.onion:8333 "onetry"

Thank you! that worked perfectly. Thank you for the issue link as well.

@rootzoll
Copy link
Collaborator

The v1.6.3 will have a automated monitoring and adding peers of it falls down to 0. Hope this will solve this for the future.

@nyxnor
Copy link
Contributor

nyxnor commented Apr 18, 2021

@Aki113s Can you close this? Should be synced at this stage right 💯

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants