Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cannot send payment to Starblocks #85

Closed
twofrontteeth opened this issue Jun 17, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Cannot send payment to Starblocks #85

twofrontteeth opened this issue Jun 17, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@twofrontteeth
Copy link

twofrontteeth commented Jun 17, 2018

I have followed Stadicus's guide (with thanks!) and setup my testnet lnd wallet without issue. Payments to Y'alls work instantly (Fish likes Milk). Unfortunately payments to Starblocks aren't working. I use the same command "lncli sendpayment --pay_req=lnt...." to both sites. I get the following timeout

"payment_error": "payment attempt not completed before timeout of 1m0s",
"payment_preimage": "",
"payment_route": null

I have had the lightning wallet up and running on testnet for about 72 hours and have and the same error the whole time. I have 4 peers and 6 channels. Using LND version 0.4.2

TFT

@Stadicus
Copy link
Collaborator

If Y'alls works and you have enough liquidity in your open channels, Starblocks should not be an issue. However, they had connectiviy / liquidity issues in the past, so the problem might not even be on your end.

BTW: you can also just use lncli payinvoice [INVOICE] for a faster payment.

If the issue persists, you can ask Acinq directly on their live chat (gitter) on https://gitter.im/ACINQ/eclair, they are very helpful.

@twofrontteeth
Copy link
Author

Thanks for looking at this Stadicus. Unfortunately the same issue remains. I will ask Acinq as suggested.

I have a further question. My testnet balance doesn't seem to be updating after successful testnet transactions (to Yall's - the articles open in full after the payment). I assume the wallet balance would decrease by the amount/value ie 150. I only raise this on the chance it is related to the other issue rather than PEBKAC. Example:

admin@Raspibolt:~ $ lncli walletbalance
{
"total_balance": "43999655",
"confirmed_balance": "43999655",
"unconfirmed_balance": "0"
}
admin@Raspibolt:~ $ lncli payinvoice lntb1500n1pdj5wfspp5ed2kdpel3qys647hyl80f7le39lyz6pax655qzhu6z5dt2yf67sqdpa2fjkzep6ypfkzar0wd5xj3rfvdjjq6rpwvs8xetkv4exzmpqdejhwgrpv3j8ycqzysedgqyqj5fpm9klrhsg93qy2p7tvmn6jj9e3nnjxsz565npxff77yw3pdaegh76wfawhqmk4x8kdv6kdjf70yusd6qznj58nm45gd4zsqw4vpg4
{
"payment_error": "",
"payment_preimage": "234a11054c617203d9f824a6fcd4525bd056892a7a559bcbf78623384c28a18f",
"payment_route": {
"total_time_lock": 1326065,
"total_amt": 150,
"hops": [
{
"chan_id": 1457407060675723264,
"chan_capacity": 16326338,
"amt_to_forward": 150,
"expiry": 1326065,
"amt_to_forward_msat": 150000
}
],
"total_amt_msat": 150000
}
}
admin@Raspibolt:~ $ lncli listpayments
{
"payments": [
{
"payment_hash": "cb5566873f88090d57d727cef4fbf9897e41683d36a9400afcd0a8d5a889d7a0",
"value": "150",
"creation_date": "1529493838",
"path": [
"02212d3ec887188b284dbb7b2e6eb40629a6e14fb049673f22d2a0aa05f902090e"
],
"fee": "0",
"payment_preimage": "234a11054c617203d9f824a6fcd4525bd056892a7a559bcbf78623384c28a18f"
}
]
}
admin@Raspibolt:~ $ lncli walletbalance {
"total_balance": "43999655",
"confirmed_balance": "43999655",
"unconfirmed_balance": "0"
}

Again - many thanks for your time and efforts.

TFT

@Cees2daBees
Copy link

Hi TFT,
the command lncli walletbalance shows your on-chain tBTC balance.
when making lightning payments they will be drawn from your lightning channel balance and can be checked using:
lncli channelbalance

@robclark56
Copy link
Contributor

robclark56 commented Jun 21, 2018

Comment: seeing reports of incompatibility between c-lightning (eclair, starblocks) & lnd. Something to do with compression used by c-lightning that is not in the BOLT standards. Not 100% sure of my facts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants