Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

added permutation transform #35

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 21, 2018
Merged

added permutation transform #35

merged 2 commits into from Mar 21, 2018

Conversation

nmaxwell
Copy link

Added permutation matrix

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 99.438% when pulling 6ea8217 on nmaxwell:master into 131854e on sgillies:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 27, 2018 •
edited

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 49cc6d9 on nmaxwell:master into 131854e on sgillies:master.

@sgillies
Copy link
Member

@nmaxwell I'm mostly in favor of this, can you add a short paragraph about the motivation for the PR? A little context will help the project out.

@nmaxwell
Copy link
Author

@sgillies Sorry, missed your comment. I needed this to handle some ortho images which used a non-standard convention in which rows/columns were switched.

@sgillies sgillies added this to the 2.2 milestone Mar 21, 2018
@sgillies sgillies mentioned this pull request Mar 21, 2018
Closed
@sgillies sgillies merged commit 32448bb into rasterio:master Mar 21, 2018
@sgillies
Copy link
Member

Thanks @nmaxwell ! I just now released 2.2.0 with the permutation matrix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sgillies sgillies sgillies approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.2
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@nmaxwell @coveralls @sgillies