Nullable DateOnly fields - is there a reason they're expanded? #13944
ItsRobbAllen
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Hi This is all about the We are using
Best regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
-
This is fixed here, I believe: #13947 (review) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
If I have a class with
It gets stored as
But if the property is nullable
public DateOnly? Expiration {get;set;}
Then it looks like this
Is there a reason for this that I'm missing?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions