Use WAL mode for the database

[wmertens]

Fixes #15

Untested, and it splits the database file into 3 files. Perhaps this should be optional?

[rawberg]

I agree this should be optional. is there a clean way to support this if a user wants to opt into WAL mode?

[wmertens]

Yes, only add the WAL command to the exec string if the user chose that option.

…

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017, 3:48 AM David Feinberg ***@***.***> wrote: I agree this should be optional. is there a clean way to support this if a user wants to opt into WAL mode? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#17 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADWlnq3q7ibIEKOmxI3neNPLB4ataipks5sV75VgaJpZM4OvPOb> .

[wmertens]

maybe something like

this.db.exec((options.concurrentDb ? 'PRAGMA journal_mode = wal; ' : '') + 'CREATE ......'

[wmertens]

I added that option in the branch.

[rawberg]

merged and published to NPM, thank you for contributing!