Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RayService][Health-Check][4/n] Remove the health check for Ray Serve applications. #1660

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2023

Conversation

kevin85421
Copy link
Member

@kevin85421 kevin85421 commented Nov 18, 2023

Why are these changes needed?

#1656 has already prevented the initiation of new RayCluster preparation based on the health status of the Ray dashboard agent and Ray Serve applications. Therefore, the RayService controller now focuses solely on whether the RayCluster is ready to handle incoming traffic. This PR removes the health check for Ray Serve applications. Ray Serve applications should be managed by Ray Core and ServeController instead of KubeRay.

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing.
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Manual tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

I do not update any test logic in this PR to prove that the definition of readiness is still the same and backward compatible.

@kevin85421 kevin85421 changed the title [RayService][Health-Check][4/n] Remove isHealth [RayService][Health-Check][4/n] Remove the health check for Ray Serve applications. Nov 18, 2023
@kevin85421 kevin85421 marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2023 00:45
Copy link
Contributor

@architkulkarni architkulkarni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@kevin85421 kevin85421 merged commit 07d14de into ray-project:master Nov 20, 2023
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants