Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Client][Proxy] Refactor RayClient Proxy to not use additional Threads. #16057

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2021

Conversation

ijrsvt
Copy link
Contributor

@ijrsvt ijrsvt commented May 25, 2021

Why are these changes needed?

  • Removes hard-to-understand and unnecessary 'queue-filler-threads'.

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

Copy link
Contributor

@AmeerHajAli AmeerHajAli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this tested somehow?

@AmeerHajAli
Copy link
Contributor

Should this be cherry-picked to ray 1.4?

1 similar comment
@AmeerHajAli
Copy link
Contributor

Should this be cherry-picked to ray 1.4?

@ijrsvt
Copy link
Contributor Author

ijrsvt commented May 25, 2021

@AmeerHajAli It is tested by the existing RayClient-Proxy tests. This is really just shuffling the internal implementation.

@ijrsvt
Copy link
Contributor Author

ijrsvt commented May 25, 2021

Failures unrelated (just a flaky Tune test).

@ijrsvt ijrsvt merged commit 113fd6e into ray-project:master May 25, 2021
@ijrsvt ijrsvt deleted the refactor-proxier branch May 25, 2021 17:07
@ijrsvt
Copy link
Contributor Author

ijrsvt commented May 25, 2021

Should this be cherry-picked to ray 1.4?

It is not necessary to be cherry picked for 1.4.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants