Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[cluster-launcher] Pick GCP cluster launcher tests and fix #37797

Merged

Conversation

rickyyx
Copy link
Contributor

@rickyyx rickyyx commented Jul 26, 2023

Why are these changes needed?

This PR has two commits:

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., git commit -s) in this PR.
  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
    • I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a
      method in Tune, I've added it in doc/source/tune/api/ under the
      corresponding .rst file.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

scv119 and others added 2 commits July 26, 2023 00:08
…y-project#37680)

Why are these changes needed?
Add release test that both check the cluster is alive, as well as the number of (autoscaled) nodes are expected.
@rickyyx
Copy link
Contributor Author

rickyyx commented Jul 26, 2023

This is to fix a GCP cluster launcher issue we discovered that was introduced in 2.5.0 cc @zhe-thoughts

Copy link
Collaborator

@zhe-thoughts zhe-thoughts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is worth picking

@rickyyx rickyyx merged commit 5c6b5bf into ray-project:releases/2.6.2 Jul 26, 2023
100 of 110 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants