[Data] Remove _block_udf from FileBasedDatasource reads
#38111
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <balaji@anyscale.com>
bveeramani
requested review from
ericl,
scv119,
c21,
amogkam,
scottjlee and
raulchen
as code owners
bveeramani
changed the title
_block_udf_block_udf from FileBasedDatasource reads
amogkam
approved these changes
Aug 8, 2023
yutsai84
pushed a commit
to yutsai84/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2023
…ect#38111) FileBasedDatasource temporarily exposed a _block_udf parameter to support read fusion. Now that read fusion is properly supported, we can remove the parameter. Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <balaji@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: Yu-Cheng Tsai <yucheng.tsai@sage.com>
NripeshN
pushed a commit
to NripeshN/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2023
…ect#38111) FileBasedDatasource temporarily exposed a _block_udf parameter to support read fusion. Now that read fusion is properly supported, we can remove the parameter. Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <balaji@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: NripeshN <nn2012@hw.ac.uk>
harborn
pushed a commit
to harborn/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2023
…ect#38111) FileBasedDatasource temporarily exposed a _block_udf parameter to support read fusion. Now that read fusion is properly supported, we can remove the parameter. Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <balaji@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: harborn <gangsheng.wu@intel.com>
harborn
pushed a commit
to harborn/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2023
…ect#38111) FileBasedDatasource temporarily exposed a _block_udf parameter to support read fusion. Now that read fusion is properly supported, we can remove the parameter. Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <balaji@anyscale.com>
arvind-chandra
pushed a commit
to lmco/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2023
…ect#38111) FileBasedDatasource temporarily exposed a _block_udf parameter to support read fusion. Now that read fusion is properly supported, we can remove the parameter. Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <balaji@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: e428265 <arvind.chandramouli@lmco.com>
vymao
pushed a commit
to vymao/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2023
…ect#38111) FileBasedDatasource temporarily exposed a _block_udf parameter to support read fusion. Now that read fusion is properly supported, we can remove the parameter. Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <balaji@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: Victor <vctr.y.m@example.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why are these changes needed?
FileBasedDatasourcetemporarily exposed a_block_udfparameter to support read fusion. Now that read fusion is properly supported, we can remove the parameter.Related issue number
Checks
git commit -s) in this PR.scripts/format.shto lint the changes in this PR.method in Tune, I've added it in
doc/source/tune/api/under thecorresponding
.rstfile.