Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci] jail //python/ray/serve:test_websockets #39375

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

can-anyscale
Copy link
Collaborator

@can-anyscale can-anyscale commented Sep 7, 2023

//python/ray/serve:test_websockets is becoming very flaky, jail it

Screenshot 2023-09-07 at 12 51 30 AM

Test:

  • CI

Signed-off-by: can <can@anyscale.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@edoakes edoakes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thx, will fix it after

@aslonnie aslonnie merged commit 1491937 into master Sep 7, 2023
103 of 107 checks passed
@aslonnie aslonnie deleted the can-serve-flaky branch September 7, 2023 17:54
@aslonnie
Copy link
Collaborator

aslonnie commented Sep 7, 2023

thx, will fix it after

do you have a pr/link/something that we can track the progress of the fixing?

harborn pushed a commit to harborn/ray that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2023
it has become very flaky recently.

Signed-off-by: can <can@anyscale.com>
@sihanwang41
Copy link
Contributor

sihanwang41 commented Sep 8, 2023

Hi @aslonnie and @can-anyscale looks like the test is not being run. here is my pr triggering the test: https://buildkite.com/ray-project/premerge/builds/5248#018a71c9-6550-4f3e-bd16-12bbe7132bfc

@aslonnie
Copy link
Collaborator

aslonnie commented Sep 8, 2023

the test did run, but in 3 parallel dockers, and only one has tests.

@can-anyscale ..

instance_type: medium
soft_fail: true
commands:
- bazel run //ci/ray_ci:test_in_docker -- //... serve --run-flaky-tests --parallelism-per-worker 3
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sihanwang41 , your PR #39413 seems to have fixed the test, so you can revert this PR's change in your PR.

@can-anyscale

  • maybe remove the --parallelism-per-worker 3 ?
  • and/or fix the issue of running 0 tests in a parallel container.

@can-anyscale
Copy link
Collaborator Author

oops my bad, I'll fix the 0 test issues

jimthompson5802 pushed a commit to jimthompson5802/ray that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2023
it has become very flaky recently.

Signed-off-by: can <can@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Thompson <jimthompson5802@gmail.com>
vymao pushed a commit to vymao/ray that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2023
it has become very flaky recently.

Signed-off-by: can <can@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor <vctr.y.m@example.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants