Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 6, 2024. It is now read-only.

Specify a custom User superclass to use #141

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

joelvh
Copy link
Contributor

@joelvh joelvh commented Nov 15, 2015

Create a configurable way to specify a superclass for CASino::User. This allows CASino to become an extension of an existing application, where the "user" is the joining model for many other relationships. This is a clean way to make sure the "user" association on other CASino models are of the proper user class as well.

@joelvh
Copy link
Contributor Author

joelvh commented Mar 16, 2017

@pencil any reason this was not pulled in?

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.007%) to 97.208% when pulling fa61537 on identification-io:subclass_user into fed0626 on rbCAS:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.007%) to 97.208% when pulling 9f6b31f on identification-io:subclass_user into fed0626 on rbCAS:master.

@joelvh
Copy link
Contributor Author

joelvh commented May 11, 2017

@pencil can this be merged in?

@joelvh
Copy link
Contributor Author

joelvh commented Jul 11, 2017

@pencil any interest in pulling this in? I think it's very reasonable not to have to be forced to use CASino::User namespace - unless there is another approach to this already in the gem?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants