Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kinto.sh github organization? #677

Open
joshgoebel opened this issue May 28, 2022 · 14 comments
Open

Kinto.sh github organization? #677

joshgoebel opened this issue May 28, 2022 · 14 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@joshgoebel
Copy link
Contributor

Any thoughts on making this an organization - then our reboot of xkeysnail could live there as well... going thru the whole "we lost the maintainer and now no one can do anything, so we have to create an organization the hard way" with Base 16 colors right now... and since we're looking for a new home for xkeysnail anyways seemed like a reasonable idea... and making a whole org just for just that single project seems a bit overkill to me...

Thoughts?

@joshgoebel joshgoebel added the question Further information is requested label May 28, 2022
@rbreaves
Copy link
Owner

rbreaves commented May 28, 2022

Accidentally posted prematurely just now. I’m interested but not sure of the legalities of setting up an org just for these projects & related efforts. I also have sorun.me but it might be covering too much.

We could model it after Buddies of Budgie or Lucee I imagine, but I think it’d be good if we discussed this more in a chat of some kind real time or video chat.

You can DM me on Twitter, gbit86, initially & I can give you better contact info from there.

I would be very happy to have 2, 3 or more maintainers involved w/ Kinto though & xkeysnail.

I’ll be busy tomorrow but late Sunday or any time Monday onward will be fine.

@joshgoebel
Copy link
Contributor Author

but not sure if the legalities of setting up an org just for these projects

I'm not talking any legal entities or corporations... just a github organization - anyone can make them... I'll reach out.

@joshgoebel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@luizoti

How would you all feel about the name keysie-soze? I have a long history of naming projects ie... and it's a play on keyser soze from The Usual Suspects. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyser_S%C3%B6ze

If we're going to hard fork it (vs the author showing up and passing on maintainership) I think we need a new name...

@luizoti
Copy link

luizoti commented May 28, 2022

@luizoti

How would you all feel about the name keysie-soze? I have a long history of naming projects ie... and it's a play on keyser soze from The Usual Suspects. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyser_S%C3%B6ze

If we're going to hard fork it (vs the author showing up and passing on maintainership) I think we need a new name...

Even if the creator appears, I see no reason not to change the name and start a new repository.

Even because at some point it is very likely that the project needs to support Wayland, and Xkeysnail, it would be strange.

Regarding the name keysie-soze, no problem, but I remembered a DC character, Omnifarious I remember his power is to have many shapes and powers when pressing capsules with a gas, maybe something like key-Omnifarious (Omnifarious is long, maybe an abbreviation and simplification ).

@joshgoebel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Even because at some point it is very likely that the project needs to support Wayland, and Xkeysnail, it would be strange.

Yeah, I had thought of that... but still if the author showed up and could transfer everything over [all the github issues, etc] (vs us setting things up from scratch)... that'd be a good reason to leave the name alone (for at least a bit)... get out a new release or two first...

I really don't think support Weyland is that hard JUST you need a library/way to ask it what the current application is... that's not our job... weyland needs to expose that - we're just a consumer... and then we need to clean up our internal API just a bit so that we seamlessly work with X or Weyland (wrapping them both in a nice abstraction).

key-Omnifarious

I don't really care for that much. sorry. Omnikey is cool but already a thing. Evidentally "keysie" is a brand name for a keyring opener or something....

@luizoti
Copy link

luizoti commented May 29, 2022

Yes, it shouldn't be too complex to include Wayland and it shouldn't be feasible to mess with it now, as not every distro uses it.

Regarding the name, it's secondarily per hour.

Well, for now, we can continue in a fork, if the project changes a lot and progresses a lot, maybe it's a good idea to disconnect from the original repository.

@joshgoebel
Copy link
Contributor Author

We need a new name to release a new python library, assuming we're starting on our own.

@luizoti
Copy link

luizoti commented May 29, 2022

So a name will be needed, even if temporary, xkeysnail-neo should do for now, what do you think?

@joshgoebel
Copy link
Contributor Author

joshgoebel commented May 29, 2022

Nice, but I'd hate to change the name twice. What about keyscrew, a play on the existing key-nail :-) [and dropping the X of course)

@luizoti
Copy link

luizoti commented May 29, 2022

@joshgoebel
Copy link
Contributor Author

joshgoebel commented Jun 5, 2022

@rbreaves I'm making really good progress on my fork. How would you feel if (in a few more days after I'm a bit further) I start mentioning it here on a some of the issues where it seems most relevant (might offer a fix, etc)...? I've been pretty active over on xkeysnail, but there really isn't anyone there to bother (other than users whose problems I might be resolving)...

I don't want you to think I'm spamming your project's issues. :-)

@luizoti I decided to go with keyszer... After reviewing your PR further I decided to start laying all my changes on top of 0.4 mainline instead. You had implemented some things I really like, but often not in the way I'd choose to - and you've implemented a lot of things I'm not convinced we need at all. It was going to be too hard to pick and choose (even despite you making some attempt to keep the commit history clean).

Some of those additional things (process management) do seem useful, but I'm not certain that they aren't better handled by systemd (which should be more than capable of single process handling) or a tiny bash script, etc... so I'm hesitant to add them until exploring the other avenues first. Features are often much easier to add than they are to remove. (once one person decides a feature is indispensable)

If you'd like to discuss any individual patches you think I should have a closer look at please open an issue on my fork.

@luizoti
Copy link

luizoti commented Jun 6, 2022

@joshgoebel

Well, I already imagined that this would happen, but I decided to see how far it would go.

Most of the changes I made didn't directly touch the core of the original project, so the changes you made 2 or 5 days ago (maybe) would fit there, and the rest I would have no problem revising and/or removing.

I have no plans to discuss it individually because you already reviewed my PR and decided not to use it, so I won't waste time 2x opening an issue in a discussion that has already occurred.

I don't use the original version today because it always had limitations that I fixed in my fork, one of them was the need for external means to run xkeysnail (bash script) and the fact that the hot-plug doesn't work and of course, my control just doesn't was detected, etc., etc.

For now, I'm not excited to collaborate anymore, I'll wait and if it works for me, I should use it, keep up the work.

@joshgoebel
Copy link
Contributor Author

joshgoebel commented Jun 6, 2022

so the changes you made 2 or 5 days ago

Most of my big changes has been this weekend and I've changed quite a bit I think (or it sure feels like it). The input system is almost entirely new, running on asyncio now. The entire conditional configuration stuff has been made consistent so that WM_NAME would be easy to add, etc...

so I won't waste time 2x opening an issue in a discussion that has already occurred.

But that's part of the problem - is I don't think the discussion has taken place (for many of these items). You had issues, you fixed them to your liking. That's awesome... but is the fix correct for everyone? Does it have side effects? Is there a much better/cleaner solution? Those are the questions I'm used to being able to ask/research/etc when reviewing PRs, etc... so after much lot of thought I decided to start from the "stable" base that most users would already be running, 0.4.0...

For now, I'm not excited to collaborate anymore,

Sorry if I made you unexcited, that certainly wasn't my goal. What I mean what I said "open an issue" wasn't for you to just create 100 issues, but rather if you thought a few things you did were super important/relevant I'd be happy for you to direct my focus to just a few rather than my trying to look over all 100+, etc... it's really hard when you have a branch diverge so much and no maintainer to provide thoughts/comments... that's where the other person was coming from when they [a bit rudely] said "why would anyone merge this" or something like that...

  • one of them was the need for external means to run xkeysnail (bash script)

I think the "best way" to run the mapper is still an open question... In my README so far I imagine people might want to run it as themselves (via .xinitrc) ... and of course kinto has great luck running it via systemd... which should probably be fine if running as a less privleged user than root. It may be some people want to run it with a small wrapper (to run other things like kbset, etc)...

I'll have to glance at your script again to see what it does... (I was mostly looking at the python code changes)

  • and the fact that the hot-plug doesn't work

That part of the code has been largely rewritten in my fork but I only had a mouse to play around with. If it doesn't work I'm definitely interested in knowing how/why and fixing it. Hot plug is something that should definitely "just work".

my control just doesn't was detected,

I went a simpler direction with the detection... if a device has A-Z and QWERTY keys, lets call it a keyboard... I think that should auto-detect all actual keyboards... (but if I'm wrong, happy to have another look)

I'll wait and if it works for me, I should use it, keep up the work.

I plan to have it more stable in a few days... I'll definitely ping you if you want to give it a shot then.

@joshgoebel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Perhaps part of this discussion would be where to put things that might "live outside" Kinto but still be of super interest to kinto users... you've said you aren't interested in "outside config"...

I just added a ctrl-, (preferences) shortcut to my Sublime Text... the first thing i thought of doing was contributing it back to Kinto - BUT there is no Linux equivalent - I had to actually edit my key mappings inside Sublime Text 4 and add the mapping.

I can see why we don't want to manage/ship 100 different config files for software, but perhaps we could use the Wiki for things like this? "User contributed per software config" and any tips of how to make the experience of using ANY software with Kinto (making it more mac like)... anything that couldn't make it into Kinto proper could perhaps have a place to live on the Wiki.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants