Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switching to a population level object #2

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 24, 2017

Conversation

LeahPrice
Copy link
Collaborator

Instead of having a particle level object, this version uses a population level object with values stored in an std::vector and log weights stored in an arma::vec.

An MCMC step was also added to Initialise().

Instead of having a particle level object, this version uses a population level object with values stored in an std::vector and log weights stored in an arma::vec.

An MCMC step was also added to Initialise().
Copy link
Collaborator

@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks pretty good!

The Travis CI run failed, and that is partly my fault as the setup is fairly rigid. The package now needs RcppArmadillo, and we have to add this.

That is as easy as:

1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
.travis.yml | 2 +-

modified   .travis.yml
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ before_install:
   - ./run.sh bootstrap
 
 install:
-  - ./run.sh install_aptget r-cran-rcpp 
+  - ./run.sh install_aptget r-cran-rcpp r-cran-rcpparmaillo
   
 script:
   - ./run.sh run_tests

Can you please try this?

@LeahPrice
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sure, thank you for the lines to fix this! It looks like it passed this time.

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Collaborator

I think with that we're good. Let's wait for @adamjohansen to take a peek at it, but I think we got this one covered now. Yay!

(As for going forward: go to the travis-ci.org website and assign your rcppsmc (and/or other repos you want tested. You need to turn this one at a time for new repos. Forks usually work as is, but because you were not set up before it did not automagically work. This is hugely worth it so I recommend you look into it.)

@LeahPrice
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Cool, thank you! Yeah it'll be nice to not get a surprise failure with Travis CI when I do future pull requests.

Copy link
Collaborator

@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are a few small things (indentation etc) in here which we can clean up later.

and removing particle.h because it was replaced by population.h in a previous commit.
Using Rcpp attributes, using a namespace for each example and switching to armadillo vectors where possible in the examples.
@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the additional commits. I think it might be best to just hold off committing until @adamjohansen is back online (which should be today) and we can finalize this.

Copy link
Collaborator

@adamjohansen adamjohansen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great to me. Thanks both of you and apologies for the slow reply...

@@ -112,6 +115,8 @@ namespace smc {
double GetParticleLogWeightN(long n) const { return pPopulation.GetLogWeightN(n); }
///Return the unnormalized weight of particle n
double GetParticleWeightN(long n) const { return pPopulation.GetWeightN(n); }
///Return the unnormalized weight of particle n
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this comment match what the function actually does?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yes you're right, thanks. I meant to say "Return the unnormalised weights of the particles". I'll fix that up now.

@LeahPrice
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Also sorry Adam, I for some reason thought that my commits today wouldn't show up on this pull request. I hope this wasn't too annoying for you to review.

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Collaborator

I for some reason thought that my commits today wouldn't show up on this pull request

You could revert these commits. Not yet saying you should, just saying you could.

If you want commits to be somewhere else, create a branch first. What happened here is perfectly logical and a feature -- one wants to be able to add to / augment a pull request.

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Collaborator

But I think we're good. here. Let me merge this now, and then we can do smaller / simpler follow-up PRs.

@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel merged commit 134a9cf into rcppsmc:master Jul 24, 2017
@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Collaborator

@LeahPrice One thing you want to look into is defining your username and email:

*   134a9cf - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Merge pull request #2 from LeahPrice/PopulationLevel (36 seconds ago) <Dirk Eddelbuettel>
|\
| * 43f3a63 - Rcpp attributes and example namespaces (8 hours ago) <Unknown>
| * 8ef8afd - Updating copyright headers (8 hours ago) <Unknown>
| * 7eca96b - Adding RcppArmadillo to installs (2 days ago) <Unknown>
| * 834d3c7 - Switching to a population level object (2 days ago) <Unknown>
|/
* 63bb33d - small update for registration (4 days ago) <Dirk Eddelbuettel>

"Unknown" is not the type of credit you want in the long run.

@LeahPrice
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Okay cool, thanks. I still haven't fixed that comment for the function so I'll do that in another pull request then.

@LeahPrice LeahPrice deleted the PopulationLevel branch July 26, 2017 00:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants