-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 845
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add in place and multithread support for more of the MolStandardize code #6970
Merged
greglandrum
merged 8 commits into
rdkit:master
from
greglandrum:feat/mt_fragmentchooser
Dec 12, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9173f5c
add inPlace version of the LargestFragmentChooser
greglandrum 8260327
more inplace support in standardization
greglandrum ff0862e
in place tautomer canonicalization and tautomer parent
greglandrum bf86f88
warning removal
greglandrum 6c19c81
add python wrappers for that
greglandrum 787e759
unrelated: make boost::stacktrace work again
greglandrum b1ef899
sanitize the result of fragmentInPlace to be consistent with previous…
greglandrum 1e96b97
changes in response to review
greglandrum File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Making weight depend on formal charge looks a bit of a hack, and could lead to unintentional ties (10 formal charges count like one neutron). Wouldn't it be better to leave formal charge out of the weight computation and rather add it as an additional compare criterion?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is clearly a heuristic (sounds nicer than "hack") and it doesn't have to be exactly correct, just reproducible.
Plus, how often are you going to have a molecule with two fragments which have the same number of atoms and the same atoms but which differ by one neutron and a net formal charge difference of 10?
I think it's a theoretical risk. :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is a hack :-) but I am fine with it.