Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix UI styles #57

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Jul 10, 2019
Merged

Fix UI styles #57

merged 5 commits into from Jul 10, 2019

Conversation

lucasbento
Copy link
Member

Summary

This PR puts back the logo that we used for loading and add a little bit of margin below the title.

Checklist

  • I tested this thoroughly
  • I added the documentation in README.md (if needed)

@lucasbento lucasbento requested a review from pvinis as a code owner July 10, 2019 06:27
@lucasbento
Copy link
Member Author

cc @RubenSandwich
I just put the old logo back for the spinner as the current one is kinda squared and doesn't really work well for the loading, please let me know your thoughts.

I'll merge this right now but we can definitely discuss further.

@lucasbento lucasbento merged commit 4650555 into master Jul 10, 2019
@lucasbento lucasbento deleted the fix/ui-styles branch July 10, 2019 06:29
@RubenSandwich
Copy link
Contributor

@lucasbento No worries, that makes sense.

Another idea for the loading animation is to use a skeleton screen.

@lucasbento
Copy link
Member Author

@RubenSandwich: that would be so cool, the spinner is there just because we did it in a rush.

Would you have time to open a PR implementing it?

@RubenSandwich
Copy link
Contributor

@lucasbento Yeah give me about a week and I'll have a PR.

@lucasbento
Copy link
Member Author

@RubenSandwich: awesome! created an issue for it: #58.

Thank you for your work 🙂

@RubenSandwich
Copy link
Contributor

@lucasbento No worries, thanks for managing this project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants