enhance: Improve error boundary

[ntucker]

Motivation

rethrowing non-network errors is ruining the stack trace, making it seem like there's a bug in Data Client.

Solution

Make our ErrorBoundary fully capable and flexible - and catch everything. Rely on our custom NetworkError to correctly craft the message to include status text, etc.

Everything applies to AsyncBoundary as well since it renders ErrorBoundary.

Adding

• ErrorBoundary export (NetworkErrorBoundary is the same thing)
• ErrorBoundary.listen: Subscription handler to reset error state on events like URL location changes

    <AsyncBoundary listen={history.listen}>
      <MatchedRoute index={0} />
    </AsyncBoundary>

• fallbackComponent.resetErrorBoundary prop

Fixing

• default fallbackComponent supports react native

Internal change

Test coverage now runs without typechecks as both are very memory intensive and somewhat cpu intensive.

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 2da1446

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 2 packages

Name	Type
@data-client/react	Patch
rdc-website	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[notwillk]

LGTM

[github-actions]

Benchmark

Benchmark suite	Current: 2da1446	Previous: 3af5411	Ratio
normalizeLong	476 ops/sec (±0.49%)	479 ops/sec (±1.68%)	1.01
infer All	9582 ops/sec (±1.51%)	9583 ops/sec (±1.35%)	1.00
denormalizeLong	319 ops/sec (±2.18%)	318 ops/sec (±2.51%)	1.00
denormalizeLong donotcache	856 ops/sec (±1.23%)	830 ops/sec (±1.10%)	0.97
denormalizeShort donotcache 500x	1335 ops/sec (±0.16%)	1350 ops/sec (±0.26%)	1.01
denormalizeShort 500x	952 ops/sec (±0.32%)	956 ops/sec (±0.23%)	1.00
denormalizeShort 500x withCache	4892 ops/sec (±0.47%)	5022 ops/sec (±0.37%)	1.03
denormalizeLong with mixin Entity	306 ops/sec (±0.46%)	299 ops/sec (±0.46%)	0.98
denormalizeLong withCache	6766 ops/sec (±0.29%)	6468 ops/sec (±0.19%)	0.96
denormalizeLong All withCache	6410 ops/sec (±0.61%)	6030 ops/sec (±0.14%)	0.94
denormalizeLong Query-sorted withCache	6412 ops/sec (±0.26%)	6526 ops/sec (±0.23%)	1.02
denormalizeLongAndShort withEntityCacheOnly	1554 ops/sec (±0.38%)	1536 ops/sec (±0.43%)	0.99
getResponse	4622 ops/sec (±0.80%)	4881 ops/sec (±1.01%)	1.06
getResponse (null)	5294287 ops/sec (±0.64%)	5444580 ops/sec (±0.35%)	1.03
getResponse (clear cache)	295 ops/sec (±0.47%)	286 ops/sec (±0.52%)	0.97
getSmallResponse	2471 ops/sec (±0.31%)	2539 ops/sec (±0.26%)	1.03
getSmallInferredResponse	1852 ops/sec (±0.35%)	1832 ops/sec (±0.17%)	0.99
getResponse Query-sorted	4493 ops/sec (±0.44%)	4557 ops/sec (±0.17%)	1.01
getResponse Collection	4961 ops/sec (±1.09%)	4859 ops/sec (±0.65%)	0.98
get Collection	4519 ops/sec (±0.43%)	4751 ops/sec (±0.41%)	1.05
setLong	480 ops/sec (±0.37%)	481 ops/sec (±0.54%)	1.00
setLongWithMerge	191 ops/sec (±0.27%)	189 ops/sec (±0.40%)	0.99
setLongWithSimpleMerge	205 ops/sec (±0.28%)	205 ops/sec (±0.25%)	1
setSmallResponse 500x	861 ops/sec (±0.50%)	852 ops/sec (±0.38%)	0.99

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.49%. Comparing base (1b66aed) to head (657977f).

❗ Current head 657977f differs from pull request most recent head 2da1446. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2da1446 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3010      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.46%   98.49%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         119      122       +3     
  Lines        2154     2186      +32     
  Branches      435      439       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         2121     2153      +32     
  Misses         21       21              
  Partials       12       12              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.