You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your fantastic work and beautiful code! As described in the paper, you use position control instead of velocity control on the robomimic tasks for diffusion policy. However, I didn't find the corresponding changes to the robomimic environment controller in the code, except for the use of "abs_action". Did I miss something?
Thank you so much for your time.
Best regards,
Weikang
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @wkwan7, good question. The conversion to positional control is done in 2 parts:
Robomimic envs already have built-in support for positional control (they actually implemented velocity control on top of positional controller). This behavior is controled by "control_delta" argument for their env controllers, which is set to false by the abs_action flag here
Robomimic's hdf5 datasets also need be converted to positional control using this script that outputs a new copy of the hdf5 with the only difference being the 7DoF action overwritten to positional actions. This script optionally verifies that the resulting positional actions result in the same robot behavior if you set the "--eval-dir" variable. If you are only interested in reproducing our result, the converted hdf5 files are already provided through datasets hosted on our server.
Hi,
Thank you for your fantastic work and beautiful code! As described in the paper, you use position control instead of velocity control on the robomimic tasks for diffusion policy. However, I didn't find the corresponding changes to the robomimic environment controller in the code, except for the use of "abs_action". Did I miss something?
Thank you so much for your time.
Best regards,
Weikang
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: