Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rebase #1

Merged
merged 102 commits into from
Sep 10, 2017
Merged

Rebase #1

merged 102 commits into from
Sep 10, 2017

Conversation

realcodywburns
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

elaineo and others added 28 commits March 20, 2017 13:48
Added a required space between the hashtags and words for the markup to recognize the header format.
Modify they names in order to return markdown extension.
Add a real number for sample and a placeholder for template.
Impossible to view ECIP template and sample files by GitHub
ERC23 token standard proposal
`##Title` -> `## Title`. The former would not render correctly as a section for markdown.
Right now the link in README for ECIP sample and ECIP markdown template points 404. This just corrects those links.
meta: wrong link to ECIP sample and ECIP markdown template
### Abstract

This gives a standardized view of SYSTEM transactions -- transactions that are enforced by block validity rules (i.e. if the transaction is not included, it is considered invalid) but not executed by users. Note that this does not change consensus at all, but just gives a unified view of a special type of transactions (which we already have -- block rewards) in preparation of future extension (for example, EIP96 (ethereum/EIPs#210) is one that uses SYSTEM transactions). Using this view, an Ethereum Virtual Machine itself can handle all account state changes without needing additional work from the client.
ECIP-1030: Defining the SYSTEM Transaction
ECIP-1021 and ECIP-1030 was in the ECIP folder but not in the README file.
@realcodywburns realcodywburns merged commit c98e001 into realcodywburns:master Sep 10, 2017
realcodywburns pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
9 participants