New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Redirection of spinlokd post #672
Comments
I trace back the problem seems to stem from the second Pad feature. You can check the geometry of that feature. Make sure to enable BOP check. It'll report some problem. It is known that BOP check is sometimes over sensitive to minor problems, but it is a clue. If I extended the sketch a bit, the problem goes away. Make sure you change the sketch constraint so that the top edges remains at the exact same place to avoid topo naming complain in later feature. There will sill be complain in some, but we are only concern about feature up to feature After the sketch modification, I can now add a hole to BTW. I've added a new auto fix function. And I've tested it that it can correct the problem without the sketch adjustment. I'll make a release soon. |
Hi,Lei And i think Sketch005 have some issues and it doesn't meet the specification; Mount-1.mp4Mount-2.mp4 |
I think the issue is not about the specific constraint in Sketch001, but more about forcing a recompute by making a change. I have attached a screen recording. Unfortunately it doesn't capture the right-click context menu. 2023-01-07.00-57-50.mp4 |
Hi spinlokd, you are right. And I think that it can not be an OCC problem. The problem is better seen on a simpler test case in which fillets are removed: The problem is reproduced with following steps:
|
Hmm... that's indeed the case. But there is even simpler way to fix it. Just recompute |
Hi RT, have you seen this problem affecting LinkDaily ?
https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=44&p=651405#p651405
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: