New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LVM: How to deal with orphaned PVs like 'lvmdev /dev/#orphans_lvm2' #2315
Comments
@mreubold
So as far as I see from those log excerpts
Please attach your var/lib/rear/layout/disklayout.conf file So it seems you got a This case is currently considered that something has gone wrong For the resoning behind see I am not really a LVM expert and I never experienced By Googling for
This description matches what there is in your
So it seems my simple test that I added to Or alternatively perhaps @rmetrich @pcahyna Should orphaned PVs be listed as active entries in disklayout.conf like
and ignored by the test in 950_verify_disklayout_file.sh
if orphaned PVs should not be recreated during "rear recover" ? |
@mreubold
at its very beginning, cf.
entry in your disklayout.conf file. |
Hello, In var/lib/rear/output there is no file. Hence I guess this issue blocks the creation of iso file and so can't do any recovery test. diskdeps.txt |
Hello,
I attach debug log file for checklayout |
@mreubold |
Hello backup is running with 950_verify_disklayout_file.sh "disabled" and the disklayout.conf file has been populated (as previewed) with : I've to ask if I can restore this lpar (it is currently in use) and let you know. |
Stale issue message |
ReaR version 2.5
SuSE Enterprise 11.4 on Power8 (ppc64)
PoverVM LPAR
System architecture PPC64
Storage SAN (FC)and/or multipath (DM)
Description of the issue (ideally so that others can reproduce it):
We've installed the latest master.zip file on the partition.
Once starting usr/sbin/rear mkbackup
we get this error messages :
Workaround, if any: no
Attachments, as applicable ("rear -D mkrescue/mkbackup/recover" debug log files):
svpsgsap22rearlog.txt
Any idea what happens ?
Many thanks
Regards,
Martin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: