Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rear issue for Suse 10 SP3 on dell 2950 #352

Closed
huawiceo opened this issue Jan 3, 2014 · 7 comments
Closed

rear issue for Suse 10 SP3 on dell 2950 #352

huawiceo opened this issue Jan 3, 2014 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug The code does not do what it is meant to do waiting for info
Milestone

Comments

@huawiceo
Copy link

huawiceo commented Jan 3, 2014

For rear testing work, I have prepared one physical server installed Suse 10 SP3.
After backup OS successfully via rear tool, I use to iso file to recover OS. But met below issue. Please help to solve. Thx

picture device independent bitmap 1

@huawiceo
Copy link
Author

huawiceo commented Jan 3, 2014

disklayout file:

#disk /dev/hda 4294965248 
disk /dev/sda 300000000000 msdos
part /dev/sda 65769984 32256 primary boot /dev/sda1
part /dev/sda 3224277504 26946049536 logical none /dev/sda10
part /dev/sda 8595417600 65802240 primary none /dev/sda2
part /dev/sda 2155023360 8661219840 primary none /dev/sda3
part /dev/sda 1024 10816243200 extended lba /dev/sda4
part /dev/sda 3224277504 10816275456 logical none /dev/sda5
part /dev/sda 3224277504 14040585216 logical none /dev/sda6
part /dev/sda 3224277504 17264894976 logical none /dev/sda7
part /dev/sda 2154991104 20489204736 logical none /dev/sda8
part /dev/sda 4301789184 22644228096 logical none /dev/sda9
#disk /dev/sdb 300000000000 msdos
#disk /dev/sdc 0 
#disk /dev/sdd 16777216 
fs /dev/sda3 / ext3 uuid=ca5a243d-dd73-46e8-a04e-1a4baaa8fbdd label= blocksize=4096 reserved_blocks=4% max_mounts=500 check_interval=60d bytes_per_inode=8184 options=rw,acl,user_xattr
fs /dev/sda10 /app ext3 uuid=4162a99f-48e3-471d-bcb9-495afa8554dc label= blocksize=4096 reserved_blocks=4% max_mounts=500 check_interval=60d bytes_per_inode=8191 options=rw,acl,user_xattr
fs /dev/sda1 /boot ext3 uuid=e0ae41cb-b340-4775-b2ef-b70409693de3 label= blocksize=1024 reserved_blocks=4% max_mounts=500 check_interval=60d bytes_per_inode=4094 options=rw,acl,user_xattr
fs /dev/sda9 /home ext3 uuid=654c37c6-bd76-4fa1-9de6-3a6f2020fce7 label= blocksize=4096 reserved_blocks=4% max_mounts=500 check_interval=60d bytes_per_inode=8180 options=rw,acl,user_xattr
fs /dev/sda7 /opt ext3 uuid=8fcd032a-044f-4d2d-ad51-c5241e1454da label= blocksize=4096 reserved_blocks=4% max_mounts=500 check_interval=60d bytes_per_inode=8191 options=rw,acl,user_xattr
fs /dev/sda8 /tmp ext3 uuid=373716e7-5b2e-42b7-bdd4-cb62fcb1e629 label= blocksize=4096 reserved_blocks=5% max_mounts=500 check_interval=60d bytes_per_inode=8184 options=rw,acl,user_xattr
fs /dev/sda5 /usr ext3 uuid=758819ab-9ce8-4d68-9b5a-514d60ddd9c3 label= blocksize=4096 reserved_blocks=4% max_mounts=500 check_interval=60d bytes_per_inode=8191 options=rw,acl,user_xattr
fs /dev/sda6 /var ext3 uuid=689d4bfc-bee9-405a-8383-5e5940e51ca4 label= blocksize=4096 reserved_blocks=4% max_mounts=500 check_interval=60d bytes_per_inode=8191 options=rw,acl,user_xattr
swap /dev/sda2 uuid= label=

@gdha
Copy link
Member

gdha commented Jan 3, 2014

@huawiceo could you try to edit the disklayout file and move the line (before recovering):

part /dev/sda 3224277504 26946049536 logical none /dev/sda10 just after the line part /dev/sda 4301789184 22644228096 logical none /dev/sda9 and retry a rear -v recover

Let us know if this help? If yes, then we hit a bug in our savelayout workflow.

@ghost ghost assigned gdha Jan 3, 2014
@huawiceo
Copy link
Author

huawiceo commented Jan 3, 2014

hi gdha, you are right. According to your guide, rear recovery testing is successfully on physical server install suse 10 sp3.

@huawiceo
Copy link
Author

huawiceo commented Jan 7, 2014

Does this bug can be fixed in next version?

@gdha
Copy link
Member

gdha commented Jan 8, 2014

I'll do my best to fix this in my spare time

@gdha
Copy link
Member

gdha commented Jan 26, 2014

@gdha
Copy link
Member

gdha commented May 6, 2014

rear-1.16 is out and fix is included

@gdha gdha closed this as completed May 6, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug The code does not do what it is meant to do waiting for info
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants