Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backup and restore raw volumes #40

Closed
jhoekx opened this issue Mar 30, 2012 · 4 comments
Closed

Backup and restore raw volumes #40

jhoekx opened this issue Mar 30, 2012 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement Adaptions and new features
Milestone

Comments

@jhoekx
Copy link
Contributor

jhoekx commented Mar 30, 2012

We do not support backing up logical volumes or partitions that are not mounted.

In case of e.g. KVM hosts, we fail to back up those disk images that are logical volumes. We also fail to backup unmounted windows partitiions.

We should give the option to dd the contents of such devices.

@gdha
Copy link
Member

gdha commented Apr 2, 2012

Personally, I believe this type of backups fall under the category "backup" and not DR. OTH, nothing stops you to write a small script and plug it into the backup directory to make this happen ;-)

@dagwieers
Copy link
Contributor

I agree. Maybe a good alternative is to warn the user if there are logical volumes (or partitions) that are recreated but do not have a filesystem/backup. (of course only when they have not been excluded)

I don't think we are expected to take care of this. Personally I would expect VMs to run Rear as well. At least then a filesystem-level backup is done rather than a disk dump.

@gdha
Copy link
Member

gdha commented Nov 15, 2013

hum, during presentation I always Windows partitions are not covered by rear, by saying that, I believe it answers your request. No will do ;-)

@jhoekx may we close this issue?

@jhoekx
Copy link
Contributor Author

jhoekx commented Nov 15, 2013

Sure, I think I just moved it to the issue list from the original file.

@gdha gdha closed this as completed Nov 15, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Adaptions and new features
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants