Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG 2047642: [release-4.10] fix: use operator image for init containers #95

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #94

/assign nbalacha

- move function to get running pod image into common controller utils
- use operator image from running pod for init containers in topolvm
  controller and topolvm node

Signed-off-by: Leela Venkaiah G <lgangava@redhat.com>
- get the operator image name from reconciler struct

Signed-off-by: Leela Venkaiah G <lgangava@redhat.com>
@nbalacha nbalacha changed the title [release-4.10] fix: use operator image for init containers BUG 2047642: [release-4.10] fix: use operator image for init containers Jan 28, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 28, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 28, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2047642, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (ODF 4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (ODF 4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @ebenahar

In response to this:

BUG 2047642: [release-4.10] fix: use operator image for init containers

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from ebenahar January 28, 2022 13:01
Copy link
Contributor

@leelavg leelavg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 28, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: leelavg, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 28, 2022
@nbalacha nbalacha merged commit a8533f9 into openshift:release-4.10 Jan 28, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 28, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2047642 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

BUG 2047642: [release-4.10] fix: use operator image for init containers

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants