Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 2087078: [release-4.11-compatibility] Fix Multiple instances of Object Bucket, Object Bucket Claims under storage section #245

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #224

/assign GowthamShanmugam

…torage section

Signed-off-by: Gowtham Shanmugasundaram <gshanmug@redhat.com>
@GowthamShanmugam
Copy link
Contributor

/retitle Bug 2087990: [release-4.11-compatibility] Fix Multiple instances of Object Bucket, Object Bucket Claims under storage section

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.11-compatibility] Fix Multiple instances of Object Bucket, Object Bucket Claims under storage section Bug 2087990: [release-4.11-compatibility] Fix Multiple instances of Object Bucket, Object Bucket Claims under storage section May 30, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 30, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2087990, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2087990: [release-4.11-compatibility] Fix Multiple instances of Object Bucket, Object Bucket Claims under storage section

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@GowthamShanmugam
Copy link
Contributor

/retitle Bug 2087078: [release-4.11-compatibility] Fix Multiple instances of Object Bucket, Object Bucket Claims under storage section

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title Bug 2087990: [release-4.11-compatibility] Fix Multiple instances of Object Bucket, Object Bucket Claims under storage section Bug 2087078: [release-4.11-compatibility] Fix Multiple instances of Object Bucket, Object Bucket Claims under storage section May 30, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 30, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2087078, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

2 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yapei

In response to this:

Bug 2087078: [release-4.11-compatibility] Fix Multiple instances of Object Bucket, Object Bucket Claims under storage section

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 30, 2022

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: yapei.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2087078, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

2 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yapei

In response to this:

Bug 2087078: [release-4.11-compatibility] Fix Multiple instances of Object Bucket, Object Bucket Claims under storage section

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Collaborator

/approve
/lgtm

@bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 31, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bipuladh, openshift-cherrypick-robot, SanjalKatiyar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 307a893 into red-hat-storage:release-4.11-compatibility May 31, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 31, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2087078 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2087078: [release-4.11-compatibility] Fix Multiple instances of Object Bucket, Object Bucket Claims under storage section

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants