-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 127
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add apt/brew package info for binwalk and {mk,un}squashfs #418
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Binwalk
If I recall correctly, the But also, in general, having as many of the dependencies as possible installed via |
@rbs-jacob makes sense. Unfortunately Does apt/brew make sense to include for {mk,un}squashfs? If yes, I will mutate this PR to just that (or should I do a fresh one instead)?; if no, should just close this PR. |
Tough to say about Lines 50 to 60 in 6052e9b
I defer to @whyitfor and/or @EdwardLarson on this one. |
Actually, For apt:
so perhaps good enough at least in some cases? P.S. Broader longer-term question - should |
In the case of ofrak/ofrak_core/ofrak/core/squashfs.py Lines 25 to 48 in 5c1cd3b
|
One sentence summary of this PR (This should go in the CHANGELOG!)
Add apt/brew package info for binwalk and mksqashfs/unsquashfs
Link to Related Issue(s)
N/A
Please describe the changes in your request.
Added apt/brew package info for binwalk and mksqashfs/unsquashfs - not sure why it was not there already?
Anyone you think should look at this, specifically?
Not sure