-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
Adoption of annotations from specification #403
Comments
Thanks, let me follow-up with a "before" and "after" of the annotations. |
@Avni-Sharma Could you please review the spec and provide an example of how the new annotations would look like for https://github.com/operator-backing-service-samples/postgresql-operator ?
|
Currently, the annotations are like
In the current scenario we have the |
hi @Avni-Sharma - I have opened this issue in the spec side to also support environment variables. I was convinced that in cases of non-sensitive data it's still a very practical and used method. =) |
Reference - servicebinding/spec#25 |
Community meeting notes:
|
@Avni-Sharma will be implementing this with my collaboration. The plan so far is, with the changes introduced in #407 :
I currently don't believe it is necessary to have more hands on the deck for this. What do y'all think? |
/assign @Avni-Sharma |
Support added in #628 |
The section of the service binding specification that describes the
x-descriptors
andannotations
that a service should use to be bindable uses slightly different names than what SBO supports today.A proposal is:
This is an important item to get adoption of the spec, since we're starting to reach out to services (Strimzi, Postgresql, etc) to make them more bindable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: