Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update API group to binding.operators.coreos.com #865

Merged

Conversation

pedjak
Copy link
Contributor

@pedjak pedjak commented Feb 5, 2021

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 5, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #865 (01621d8) into master (395e87b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #865   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.19%   61.19%           
=======================================
  Files          26       26           
  Lines        1956     1956           
=======================================
  Hits         1197     1197           
  Misses        584      584           
  Partials      175      175           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
controllers/servicebinding_controller.go 5.55% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 395e87b...457a39d. Read the comment docs.

layout: go.kubebuilder.io/v3
projectName: service-binding-operator
repo: github.com/redhat-developer/service-binding-operator
resources:
- crdVersion: v1
group: operators
group: binding
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously the group name was plural operators, shouldn't the new group name be plural as well?
bindings instead of binding.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The previous group name was set so that it matches the group used by OLM. Best practice is to keep group name as singular, because they are very much equivalent to package names:

@pedjak
Copy link
Contributor Author

pedjak commented Feb 11, 2021

/retest

2 similar comments
@pedjak
Copy link
Contributor Author

pedjak commented Feb 11, 2021

/retest

@pedjak
Copy link
Contributor Author

pedjak commented Feb 11, 2021

/retest

@pmacik
Copy link
Contributor

pmacik commented Feb 11, 2021

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pmacik

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

API group name need update
5 participants