Added some phrasal verbs to avoid

[gaurav-nelson]

I was going through Applying the IBM Style Guide in Writing Product Documentation and checked to see if out rules had that info covered.

• Also, we recommend using accelerate instead of speed up:
  

[github-actions]

Click here to review and test in web IDE:

[aireilly]

Nice! need a fix here:

ERROR: 1 in .vale/fixtures/RedHat/SimpleWords/testinvalid.adoc / .vale/styles/RedHat/SimpleWords.yml

[github-actions]

⚡️ Deploying PR Preview...

[aireilly]

/lgtm nice work

[chloeredhat]

@aireilly and @gaurav-nelson (@Chandralekha-RedHat for viz)

Edit: Sorry, I'm seeing Aidan's comment above about this possible contradiction so you actually already covered it. MIssed that. However might be worth considering that both options have pros and cons and I'm not sure it's worth recommending one over the other for this reason.

Wanted to call out that I think we've made a contradiction loop:

I see pros and cons to both options:

Speed up: Not ideal that it is a phrasal verb, however, it is the most common and simple phrase for this meaning
Accelerate: Might be better for translation because it's not a phrasal verb, but it is a complex and less simple alternative which also isn't ideal

[chloeredhat]

This is another contradiction. Carry out is a phrasal verb, so accomplish would actually be preferred. Do is a good alternative though

@aireilly @gaurav-nelson @Chandralekha-RedHat

[chloeredhat]

Some other thoughts:

plenty: It's better to not put numerical descriptors at all (for example, what does "many applications" mean?) So maybe we shouldn't suggest abundance OR plenty.

absent: While I agree absent is a complicated word, it is often not going to match grammatically with "none" or "not here". For instance, "If the button is absent" != "*If the button is none" or "*If the button is not here" (not there would make sense in this example)

Also sorry, I know it's probably annoying I'm writing these comments after this PR was merged, so feel free to ignore me :D