(RHEL-36636) ci: Allow to pass parameters together with rhel-only note

[jamacku]

Supported parameters:

• feature - for feature related commits (cross-version)
• bugfix - for bugfix related commits (cross-version)
• doc - for documentation related commits (usually version specific)
• workaround - for workaround related commits (usually version-specific)
• ci - for CI related commits (version specific)
• test - for test related commits (version specific)
• other - for commits that do not fit into any of the above categories or use just rhel-only

rhel-only: ci

Related: RHEL-36636

[github-actions]

Commit validation

Tracker - RHEL-36636

The following commits need an inspection

commit	note
16b10ca - ci: allow to pass parameters together with rhel-only note	Missing upstream reference ‼️

---

Tracker validation

Success

🟢 Tracker RHEL-36636 has set desired product: CentOS Stream 10
🟢 Tracker RHEL-36636 has set desired component: systemd
🟢 Tracker RHEL-36636 has been approved

---

Pull Request validation

Success

🟡 CI - Waived
🟢 Review - Reviewed by a member
🟢 Approval - Changes were approved

---

Auto Merge

Success

🟢 Pull Request is not marked as draft and it's not blocked by dont-merge label
🟢 Pull Request meet requirements, title has correct form
🟢 Pull Request meet requirements, mergeable is true
🟠 Pull Request meet requirements, mergeable_state is unstable
🟢 Pull Request has correct target branch main
🟢 Pull Request was merged

[dtardon]

Hmm, I was proposing something different: to make this parametrized. I.e., write RHEL-only: foo, where foo could be one of feature, ci, other (subject to bikeshedding). That is, each change would be tagged with its purpose, which would then serve as a hint what to do with the change on a rebase (features - copy over, ci changes - ignore). That seems better to me than to add a new keyword for every major RHEL release...

[jamacku]

Thanks @dtardon, now I see.

[jamacku]

@dtardon, I have added an option to allow passing parameters together with rhel-only notes, as you suggested. Could you please have another look? Thank you.

[dtardon]

LGTM