Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(#2070097) udev/net_id: avoid slot based names only for single function devices #79

Conversation

msekletar
Copy link
Member

If we have two or more devices that share the same slot but they are
also multifunction then it is OK to use the slot information even if it
is the same for all of them. Name conflict will be avoided because we
will append function number and form names like, ens1f1, ens1f2...

(cherry picked from commit 66425da)

Resolves: #2070097

If we have two or more devices that share the same slot but they are
also multifunction then it is OK to use the slot information even if it
is the same for all of them. Name conflict will be avoided because we
will append function number and form names like, ens1f1, ens1f2...

(cherry picked from commit 66425da)

Resolves: #2070097
Copy link
Member

@dtardon dtardon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@systemd-rhel-bot systemd-rhel-bot added pr/needs-ci Formerly needs-ci tracker/unapproved Formerly needs-acks labels Apr 7, 2022
Copy link
Member

@jamacku jamacku left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like the CentOS CI fail is unrelated and will be fixed in 9.1 by #72.

\cc @mrc0mmand

@systemd-rhel-bot systemd-rhel-bot removed pr/needs-ci Formerly needs-ci tracker/unapproved Formerly needs-acks labels Apr 7, 2022
@systemd-rhel-bot systemd-rhel-bot merged commit aacd9b7 into redhat-plumbers:rhel-9.0.0 Apr 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants