Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Several problems in "make test" #54

Closed
farblos opened this issue Sep 20, 2019 · 11 comments
Closed

Several problems in "make test" #54

farblos opened this issue Sep 20, 2019 · 11 comments

Comments

@farblos
Copy link
Contributor

farblos commented Sep 20, 2019

There are a number of problems in the current test suite (1.66 + some PRs):

  • there are tests t/26_symlink.t and t/26_bug_26.t. One of them should be renumbered for clarity.

  • test t/26_bug_26.t is not mentioned in MANIFEST and not packaged, hence

  • test t/26_bug_26.t fails for yet unknown reasons

  • in Travis (e.g. Job #26.1 of pull request 53), common.pm moans that "zip doesn't seem to work". While that does not let fail any tests, it potentially skips essential ones

While look into these ASAP.

@farblos
Copy link
Contributor Author

farblos commented Sep 20, 2019

Can reproduce failing test t/26_bug_26.t locally but don't have the time to look into more details now. @pmqs, any opinion on that one?

No idea yet what to do about last problem ("zip doesn't seem to work") but to add diagnostic output.

@pmqs
Copy link
Contributor

pmqs commented Sep 20, 2019

  • there are tests t/26_symlink.t and t/26_bug_26.t. One of them should be renumbered for clarity.
  • test t/26_bug_26.t is not mentioned in MANIFEST and not packaged, hence

Created PR #55 to address the issues above.

@pmqs
Copy link
Contributor

pmqs commented Sep 20, 2019

Can reproduce failing test t/26_bug_26.t locally but don't have the time to look into more details now. @pmqs, any opinion on that one?

will try to get a look at.

No idea yet what to do about last problem ("zip doesn't seem to work") but to add diagnostic output.

I'm not seeing that error.

@farblos
Copy link
Contributor Author

farblos commented Sep 20, 2019

I'm not seeing that error.

Agreed. Must have been an intermittent issue, to be seen only in the one log file I've quoted above.

@farblos
Copy link
Contributor Author

farblos commented Sep 20, 2019

* test `t/26_bug_26.t` fails for yet unknown reasons

@pmqs: Seems that the zip64 PR #45 has thrown out the changes in Member.pm of your bzip compression commit 9122328. (I remember having eliminated parameter $mode to function head because the only value ever passed to that method before commit 9122328 was 1.)

I guess that this could be the root cause, but don't have time to validate it now.

Um, probably you could add a one-liner to test 26_bzip.t in your PR #54 to provide more details what the test should actually do?

@pmqs
Copy link
Contributor

pmqs commented Sep 20, 2019

@pmqs: Seems that the zip64 PR #45 has thrown out the changes in Member.pm of your bzip compression commit 9122328. (I remember having eliminated parameter $mode to function head because the only value ever passed to that method before commit 9122328 was 1.)

I guess that this could be the root cause, but don't have time to validate it now.

yes, I that is exactly why the test is failing.

Um, probably you could add a one-liner to test 26_bzip.t in your PR #54 to provide more details what the test should actually do?

Done

@redhotpenguin
Copy link
Owner

redhotpenguin commented Sep 20, 2019 via email

redhotpenguin added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 21, 2019
Minor fixes for some issue in #54
@redhotpenguin
Copy link
Owner

Sorry - maybe I read too fast here. Looks like there's still some investigation going. LMK when a release is needed.

@farblos
Copy link
Contributor Author

farblos commented Sep 21, 2019

To summarize, we have the following issues and PRs that I consider worth including in the next release:

@pmqs
Copy link
Contributor

pmqs commented Sep 21, 2019

To summarize, we have the following issues and PRs that I consider worth including in the next release:

Agree

@farblos
Copy link
Contributor Author

farblos commented Oct 8, 2019

All problems fixed in version 1.67.

@farblos farblos closed this as completed Oct 8, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants