per-command accounting for INFO #34
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Looks like my editor did something obnoxious to the whitespace, I'll fix and resubmit. Sorry for the noise. |
Closed
bratpiorka
referenced
this pull request
in TieredMemDB/TieredMemDB
Oct 11, 2021
- thread.tcache.flush command is not supported by memkind
tezc
pushed a commit
to tezc/redis
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2023
Co-authored-by: Hanna Fadida <hanna.fadida@redislabs.com>
hpatro
added a commit
to hpatro/redis
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2024
Few of the servers log are stored as `server1/2/3.log` . Various type of acl files are created and weren't getting cleaned up prior to this change.
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, Salvatore.
My first redis patch! You made an encouraging comment about this sort of stats in the more-info-in-INFO bug ticket, so I thought it'd be a good way to warm up.
It looks like it's OK to alter readonlyCommandTable that way, but if so then probably we should rename the variable.
Let me know what you think,
Mike