Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial implementation of the module I/O filter API #6140

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: unstable
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JohnSully
Copy link
Contributor

@JohnSully JohnSully commented May 30, 2019

This is based upon discussions in the modssl project. This change allows modules to filter socket I/O so they can do interesting things like support SSL encryption. I've explicitly overriden the read/write system calls to readWithFilter, writeWithFilter, etc. This is to be explicit however it would be possible to just override them with a #define and reduce the churn.

Note: Replication and Cluster support are not yet tested. Coming soon.

* Redis Object representing the argument. */
if (c->reqtype == PROTO_REQ_MULTIBULK && c->multibulklen && c->bulklen != -1
&& c->bulklen >= PROTO_MBULK_BIG_ARG)
for (;;) // read from socket until EAGAIN is returned
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is of particular importance. We need to ensure we fully flush all buffers before returning as epoll only checks the kernel's buffer.

@madolson
Copy link
Contributor

I still think this is a net good idea, however the whole implementation has now moved to the connection abstraction so all this code is just conflicting now. Any chance you want to update it?

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants