Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 30, 2022. It is now read-only.

No Related Conversation if no Tokens are extracted #155

Closed
westei opened this issue Dec 1, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

No Related Conversation if no Tokens are extracted #155

westei opened this issue Dec 1, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@westei
Copy link
Member

westei commented Dec 1, 2017

Currently no Related Conversations are suggested if no Tokens are extracted for a Conversation.

As the Conversation MLT implementation does not require any extracted Tokens this can be considered as Bug

@westei westei added this to the v0.6.1 milestone Dec 1, 2017
@westei westei self-assigned this Dec 1, 2017
westei added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2017
…nversations even if no single Token was extracted from a Conversation
@ruKurz
Copy link
Collaborator

ruKurz commented Dec 8, 2017

How to test this issue?

@westei
Copy link
Member Author

westei commented Dec 11, 2017

You need to create an Conversation with a message where no Token is extracted. In setups without InterestingTerms this is rather easy as you just need to avoid the mention of Named Entities like Person, Organisations and Places.

In a Setup with Interesting Terms its much harder to create Conversations where no Tokens are extracted. What should work is to use Messages that mention Words that do not exist, but still sound German to not fool Language Detection

I used a setup without Interesting Terms to test this more easily, but a sentence like

Was ist ein Verhausenbingler und wozu braucht man das?

is identified as German and results in no tokens to be extracted even in a setting including Interesting terms.

If you do not get related conversations you might need to close the first conversation and create a 2nd one mentioning "Verhausenbingler".

Ich habe den Verhausenbingler noch immer nicht verstanden.

now you can expect getting the first conversation based on the term "Verhausenbingler"

@ruKurz ruKurz closed this as completed Dec 12, 2017
@ruKurz ruKurz removed the in review label Dec 12, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants