New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Documentation feedback #175
Comments
Thanks for the feedback @bithavoc! We'll get on this asap. |
Oh, that label was already there so I woke it up from its slumber. I'll create a new one. |
Also, I think the same place where the docs invite the visitors to run one of those package one-liners should also mention RAM requirements, when I tried the DEB script in Ubuntu 20 LTS in a node with 2GB of RAM I get:
logs say:
So there's a minimum of memory but no mention anywhere in the docs, I'm sorry if I missed it if it's there, the only requirements I could see in the instructions page was something about XFS and port 9092, nothing else. You may be wondering why I'm trying redpanda in a VM with 2GB of RAM, well, it's my perception that given this project was built in C++ and not Java, then the minimal requirements would be more forgiving, I remember running Kafka in Docker in a VM with similar specs, it was painful due the non root user requirements in the bitnami kafka images but is totally doable. |
i think that's a good point. @0x5d - should we default to 1core ? |
I'm all about making the first impression as seamless as possible. I think @rkruze had also mentioned that the dev mode should be the default. If we make that the case, then |
Fully agree that |
Sorry I keep hijacking this thread with my experience, I know this issue was originally about about documentation but maybe this is somewhat related. First, I have Redpanda running 🚀 yay!, I was able to use rpk to produce and consume dummy messages, but even when my app is ready to use any kafka cluster I still can't use Redpanda. Here's my situation: given I have no knowledge of how to operate a redpanda cluster and there is no docker image, I'm being forced to use a dedicated server to act as a single-node redpanda cluster, I'm running it in a VM with VM-level backups so I can restore the entire thing without reconstructing my cluster. Also, my kafka app is in a kubernetes cluster in a different cloud, no VPC peering available nor I would to do it if available, so I need my app to connect to my redpanda instance via public traffic but the default setup doesn't include and tls configuration for A IMO both developer and production mode, at minimum, should work as follows:
This is where the documentation could shine:
btw, in this page it seems like |
hey @bithavoc we are working on acls right now and part of that is to tackle authentication. today we only have ssl + plain, but by the end of the december we expect to have sasl+scram in addition to plain, so you could have a common SSL+SCRAM (user and password) setup. we'll keep working on the docs, and please don't hesitate to dump more feedback here, it's great! |
@dotnwat It seems like some of the issues here have been addressed. Can you review it and pick out remaining action items?
This was resolved. |
@bmansheim i think we can close this now. I split out the idea for the compatibility table into a separate ticket to keep things simpler. everything else seemed ok. |
How do you resolve the above problem...? Because i am beginner to this and facing the same issues in redpanda .. |
@sanjaynv - it's mentioned in the thread. see developer_mode:true |
I want to track here some of the feedback I already shared with the team:
Single Node Production Setup
statesXFS
as a Requirement, turns out you can totally use redpanda without XFS, this was a show-stopper for me where I'm not looking for the best performance, I just don't want to deal with ZK so a Single node without XFS should work, my recommendation would be to either create a "tier" before "Single Node Production Setup" or the same setup but with two sections: Minimal Requirements(no XFS) and Optimal Requirements(XFS) with a link to the deployment automation. Reference: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25110390A compatibility table with Kafka would be great, I was specifically interested in topic compaction and retention and couldn't find any mention or info around it [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25113978
Apparently packagecloud is being phased out but there are still some references in the documentation, reference https://vectorized.io/documentation (spotted by Alex, I had no clue)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: