New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make library work with Immutable.js stores #54
Conversation
592a01f
to
ddc9def
Compare
Thanks for this @JulianMayorga! 🍺 I'll have to test this a bit and check that everything is working smoothly. Will get back to this next week. |
ddc9def
to
de70144
Compare
Thank you @jevakallio for such a useful library. The documentation was super useful to me. Let me know if anything comes up after your tests! |
I'd be against landing this PR. You can already use Immutable.js by passing the necessary |
redux-offline dispatches actions that do not get received by other middlewares, but they do get received by reducers. redux-little-router experienced the same problem, and they solved it by exposing a middleware, as seen in https://github.com/FormidableLabs/redux-little-router/pull/96/files
@JulianMayorga, try to rebase master? Having the merge commit in the PR makes it very hard to identify the new changes you made (as opposed to all changes that have happened in the project since you forked it, which seems to be quite a bit ago). Also, there are various merge conflicts due to this. |
Sorry @migueloller! I made some changes to my fork of redux-offline, but I never intended those changes to be accepted by you. I made them knowing that they won't be compatible with v2 of redux-offline. For example, I reverted my fork to use v1 installation method, and I also unignored lib folder because I did not want to publish my fork. I think this means that I should close this PR to avoid future confusion. So feel free to close this :D I would be more than willing to help you guys if you ever want to support immutable states! So please tell me if you want to reopen a discussion regarding Immutable. Cheers! |
It's up to @jevakallio what happens but he's likely open to adding these features. It's just that it's a bit hard to look at the changes without rebasing master. |
I think it's better if we start an issue about using Immutable stores, so I created it on #78. Let's continue the discussion over there! @jevakallio, I am closing this old PR to avoid confusion. |
I created a PR #99 for this very same issue |
No description provided.