Wrap MSW graphql for convenience #689
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Also make it typescript
|
@RobertBroersma Yay! This is awesome! It makes sense to me to wrap |
I'll push some things to you branch! |
|
@RobertBroersma I'm going to clean this up and get it merged asap, thanks for this awesome work! |
peterp
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I turned the testing index into a TS file, but I don't think those types are shipped in any way yet? I could use some help with that!
@peterp Should we also wrap
rest? It is possible to define your own serverless functions to be called with rest, right?