regen: JSON-LD/Turtle prefix collides with regen: IRI scheme

[aaronc]

We use regen: as the prefix for https://schema.regen.network# in JSON-LD and Turtle and regen: is also the IRI scheme we use for the data module. It's sort of okay in Turtle because regen:xyz and <regen:xyz> are somewhat distinct but I think it's still confusing.

I suggest we use a different prefix such as regenschema:, regenregistry: or simply r: to differentiate. Our files could be re-written to use a different prefix without changing the actual content.

[blushi]

Good catch, it might be ok in turtle but it will cause some issues in JSON-LD so best to use a different prefix indeed. I'd prefer regenschema: or r:.

[blushi]

Let's update the regen-registry-standards mentions of regen: to rs: and in regen-web