Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make version 1.0.0 to indicate stable release #28

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2020

Conversation

rohanpm
Copy link
Member

@rohanpm rohanpm commented Oct 19, 2020

This project has already been used in production for some time,
so backwards-compatibility is already important. The project
also claims to follow semver, but semver doesn't have any impact
until version 1.0.0. Per [1], "If your software is being used in
production, it should probably already be 1.0.0."

"Used by production service" and "this project is alpha,
version 0.x and we can change anything at any time" are not
compatible; it is time to take stability seriously. Mark the
version as 1.0.0 accordingly.

[1] https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html

This project has already been used in production for some time,
so backwards-compatibility is already important. The project
also claims to follow semver, but semver doesn't have any impact
until version 1.0.0.  Per [1], "If your software is being used in
production, it should probably already be 1.0.0."

"Used by production service" and "this project is alpha,
version 0.x and we can change anything at any time" are not
compatible; it is time to take stability seriously. Mark the
version as 1.0.0 accordingly.

[1] https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html
@rohanpm rohanpm marked this pull request as ready for review October 19, 2020 00:39
@rohanpm rohanpm requested review from midnightercz, querti, lipoja and a team October 19, 2020 00:39
Copy link
Contributor

@querti querti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be done for pubtools-iib as well? I know it doesn't claim to adhere to semver, but shouldn't it?

@rohanpm
Copy link
Member Author

rohanpm commented Oct 20, 2020

Should this be done for pubtools-iib as well? I know it doesn't claim to adhere to semver, but shouldn't it?

I think it probably should, though it's less important and I guess harder to enforce as well, since that project isn't quite a plain library.

@rohanpm rohanpm merged commit d52af9b into release-engineering:master Oct 22, 2020
@rohanpm rohanpm deleted the set-version-100 branch October 28, 2020 03:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants