Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(v2_meta): hint data as being potentially undefined #6231

Merged
merged 3 commits into from May 5, 2023

Conversation

machour
Copy link
Collaborator

@machour machour commented Apr 28, 2023

I've been bitten by this in production a while ago, so here's my attempt at fixing it.

Not sure why we have duplicate types definitions in the react package, instead of a re-export from server-runtime.
Also, not sure this is the smartest fix, would definitely accept a better one

Closes: #6210

  • Docs
  • Tests

Testing Strategy:

Before After
Screenshot 2023-04-28 at 10 24 22 AM Screenshot 2023-04-28 at 10 24 01 AM

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 28, 2023

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 2f658b7

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 18 packages
Name Type
@remix-run/react Patch
@remix-run/server-runtime Patch
@remix-run/testing Patch
@remix-run/cloudflare Patch
@remix-run/deno Patch
@remix-run/dev Patch
@remix-run/node Patch
@remix-run/cloudflare-pages Patch
@remix-run/cloudflare-workers Patch
create-remix Patch
@remix-run/css-bundle Patch
@remix-run/architect Patch
@remix-run/express Patch
@remix-run/netlify Patch
@remix-run/serve Patch
@remix-run/vercel Patch
remix Patch
@remix-run/eslint-config Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@machour machour linked an issue Apr 28, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
1 task
@aaronadamsCA
Copy link
Contributor

Note this is a duplicate of #5787.

@machour
Copy link
Collaborator Author

machour commented May 4, 2023

Good catch @aaronadamsCA, thank you!

@kentcdodds
Copy link
Member

I think this PR is actually better than #5787...

@machour
Copy link
Collaborator Author

machour commented May 4, 2023

Reopening for @brophdawg11 consideration.
I think that we both did half the job 😅

@brophdawg11
Copy link
Contributor

yeah I like this one better too I think

@brophdawg11 brophdawg11 self-assigned this May 5, 2023
@brophdawg11
Copy link
Contributor

FWIW this should be a less common occurence now that #6107 is merged - it was a bug that we were still calling meta() for unrendered routes below the error boundary. But this is still needed if a loader throws to it's own boundary and we will still call meta().

@brophdawg11 brophdawg11 merged commit d8bcdc1 into remix-run:dev May 5, 2023
9 checks passed
@brophdawg11 brophdawg11 added the feat:links-meta Issues related to links()/meta() label May 5, 2023
@brophdawg11 brophdawg11 removed their assignment May 5, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 6, 2023

🤖 Hello there,

We just published version v0.0.0-nightly-d8bcdc1-20230506 which includes this pull request. If you'd like to take it for a test run please try it out and let us know what you think!

Thanks!

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 Hello there,

We just published version 1.16.1-pre.0 which includes this pull request. If you'd like to take it for a test run please try it out and let us know what you think!

Thanks!

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 Hello there,

We just published version 1.16.1 which includes this pull request. If you'd like to take it for a test run please try it out and let us know what you think!

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

False type safety with meta v2
5 participants