-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggestion : custom map function #48
Comments
This kind of mapping feature would break testability, which was one of the main design goals of ReMap. In the above case you deactivated ReMap and your mapping reduces to a custom mapping method. But if I got that right you can resolve the above example in the following way: ReMap supports multiple field mappings. That means you can define multiple transformations for the same source field - this is what you want in your example. Please have a look:
This way you get full support for testability. |
it's nice thanks ! |
Just the same way - just add:
|
thanks a lot ! |
You're welcome! |
Hello
Sometime mapping cannot be do, so why not enable a custom mapping like this
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: