New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test with Safari Technology Preview #929
Comments
Safari 10.0 is supposed to support 100% of the recommended IndexDB standard: https://developer.apple.com/library/prerelease/content/releasenotes/General/WhatsNewInSafari/Articles/Safari_10_0.html |
Is that already released, or if not, when is it expected? |
I think it's supposed to be released with the next macOS version (Sierra) in the fall. |
LOL macOS |
Cool. So we just need to change it sometime before fall in rs.js. |
I'm downloading the private beta and will install it on my old Macbook to check it out. |
I tested Webmarks with the latest Safari Technology Preview Release 8 (Safari 9.1.2) and it all worked flawlessly using IndexedDB. 🎉 |
Sounds great. However, I thought we'd have to remove code that makes Safari not use IndexedDB? |
No, we only have a specific Browser/device check for Android <= 4.3. For everything else we try to create an actual database to determine if IndexedDB is supported. |
Nice! Did you also test how it behaves in private mode? |
Behaves the same as the stable Safari in private mode. |
Apple claims they considerably improved IndexedDB, so we can probably use it in Safari as well soon:
https://webkit.org/blog/6017/introducing-safari-technology-preview/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: